Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree10Likes
  • 4 Post By Linda Buquet
  • 2 Post By Dustybones
  • 2 Post By Jason Kamara
  • 2 Post By Adam Steele

Thread: Reverse Engineering the Google Local Algo

  1. #1
    Linda Buquet's Avatar
    Linda Buquet is offline Community Leader - Google Local Specialist
    Member Since
    Jun 2012
    Thanked 5,042 Times

    Reverse Engineering the Google Local Algo

    Trying to understand what's changed in the latest iteration of the Google Local Algo? Well, you aren't alone - many of us are and there has been much speculation among industry leaders.

    For awhile some where saying the algo had switched to pure maps or pure local results. All along, I've said I'm still seeing primarily organic results at the top of the pack, just like I illustrated in this post:
    How the Google Local Algo Really Works - What Rules the Ranking Order

    I'm in a Local Mastermind group with a bunch of industry leaders and Adam Steele, one of the members asked for my help on a story he was working on and just published.

    Stop Spraying and Praying - Understanding Local Results

    Easy enough. BUT, did you know that result 1 might be blended, 2, 3 and 4 local only, and the rest blended? Ya? You must read Mike’s blog you smart cookie you. Suppose you are in position two, and you are banging your head against the wall, have hundreds of citations, reviews, etc, and are doing a little link building/earning too. If you knew position one was blended, you’d know to perhaps to try and throttle back the local, and punch the organic factors. Imagine the time, money and head banging you’d save yourself. Well, we didn’t know how, and really weren’t even investigating it until Mike’s post. Someone kiss this man right now.

    So, we need to figure out what is what. The “how” is pretty simple, and I will get into that. I would like to start by sharing a bit about some interesting research we did. With all the turbulence in the SERPs lately, we wanted to figure out what was the typical pack makeup these days. Perhaps if we could figure this out, we could make assumptions on how we ought to throttle our efforts (as mentioned).
    Need to click the link and head over to read the rest for some very interesting analysis.

    I still maintain, with the very limited results I look at with my very slow manual method, that organic rules the top of the pack in most cases - but it does vary somewhat based on market, KWs and competition.

    But the bottom line is, there are MULTIPLE Google algos going on all the time. They can shift like the wind too. But the same optimization best practices apply no matter which algo is at play. You really need to work on organic as well as local factors to have a chance of showing up, regardless of how the customer searches and which search results Google serves up.

    Let's put our head's together and analyze Adam's data to see if we can figure it out.

    Do you think packs are still blended? Still organic on top? Or are they all local now?
    Is Our Content HELPFUL? Please pay the community back by sharing!

    LocalSearchForumLinda Buquet .:. Google Local Specialist

    Consulting, Troubleshooting & White Label Services for SEOs & Agencies

    Don't Miss Important News & Tips! SUBSCRIBE to Daily Email Digest Here

    Are you a PRO? Join the "Local Search Pros" G+ Community!

    Note: Due to mulitple RSI injuries, pardon short replies. Typos? Blame it on "Dragon". ;-)

  2. #2
    Dustybones's Avatar
    Dustybones is offline Local News Curator & Local Search Pro
    Member Since
    Aug 2013
    Rochester NY
    Thanked 513 Times

    Re: Reverse Engineering the Google Local Algo

    I feel as if the planets have aligned a little bit more today for me. Great post!

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Jul 2012
    Vancouver, Canada
    Thanked 10 Times

    Re: Reverse Engineering the Google Local Algo

    I caught that post last week and actually read it a couple times. It certainly jives with what you and Mike B have pointed out previously.

  4. #4
    Adam Steele's Avatar
    Adam Steele is offline Member
    Member Since
    Jul 2012
    Vancouver, BC
    Thanked 12 Times

    Re: Reverse Engineering the Google Local Algo

    Thank you for sharing Linda! Glad a few folks found some value : ) I had a heck of a time writing the post - mostly getting it to make sense. The terminology is tricky. If anyone has any questions, I would be happy to answer them.

  5. Members who thanked Adam Steele for this post:

    Jamie Steigerwald (12-13-2013),Linda Buquet (12-11-2013)

Similar Threads

  1. HOT! Track SERP Changes & Reverse Engineer Algo with Update Scanner
    By Linda Buquet in forum Local SEO Tools & Software
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-03-2015, 11:53 AM
  2. Reverse Engineering the Local SEO Algo to Steal #1
    By Linda Buquet in forum Local SEO & Ranking
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-04-2013, 02:18 AM
  3. New Google LOCAL Algo Changes - Here's the Scoop
    By Linda Buquet in forum Local Search
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-04-2012, 11:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts