Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    487
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Rel=author dead, rel=publisher not

    Official word from Google
    https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JohnMue...ts/HZf3KDP1Dm8

    In short -
    the rel=author has been a failure and is now no longer supported in its originally intended function. We've seen the photos slowly dying, so this should come as no surprise.

    Key points:

    "
    • Going forward, we're strongly committed to continuing and expanding our support of structured markup (such as schema.org). This markup helps all search engines better understand the content and context of pages on the web, and we'll continue to use it to show rich snippets in search results.
    • we're no longer processing this data -- it's not just a UI change
    • it'll be removed from the Structured Data Testing Tool too
    • publisher markup is not affected by this

    "

    Barry Schwartz will be doing a write up about this tomorrow, seems he has even more to add to the announcement.

    ---------- Post Merged at 10:01 AM ---------- Previous Post was at 09:51 AM ----------

    https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6083347?hl=en - short and sweet version

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Jun 2012
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    17,061
    Thanks (Received)
    41
    Likes (Received)
    48

    Re: Rel=author dead, rel=publisher not

    Hi Margaret, thanks for sharing!

    I was just reading the posts at Search Engine Land and Marketing Land.
    Barry posted at the latter. Here they are:

    It's Over: The Rise & Fall Of Google Authorship For Search Results

    Official: Google Ends Authorship For Search Results
    Linda Buquet .:. Forum Founder, Google Local Specialist

    If you benefit from advice here... Please pay the community back by sharing on social OR helping someone else at the forum. Thank you!

    Don't Miss Important News & Tips! Subscribe to Daily Email Digest Here

    Note: Due to mulitple RSI injuries, pardon short replies. Typos? Blame it on "Dragon".

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    487
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Re: Rel=author dead, rel=publisher not

    After a little more reading around the place: https://schema.org/author

    ---------- Post Merged at 10:08 AM ---------- Previous Post was at 10:07 AM ----------

    Oops - sorry linda, didn't see your post until after I posted my update

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Jun 2012
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    17,061
    Thanks (Received)
    41
    Likes (Received)
    48

    Re: Rel=author dead, rel=publisher not

    Oh no I had not posted about it yet, so no worries. I was just starting to read when you posted so just added a couple links.
    Linda Buquet .:. Forum Founder, Google Local Specialist

    If you benefit from advice here... Please pay the community back by sharing on social OR helping someone else at the forum. Thank you!

    Don't Miss Important News & Tips! Subscribe to Daily Email Digest Here

    Note: Due to mulitple RSI injuries, pardon short replies. Typos? Blame it on "Dragon".

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    3,284
    Thanks (Received)
    30
    Likes (Received)
    34

    Re: Rel=author dead, rel=publisher not

    Why am I not surprised? I am reminded of how nofollow was supposed to reduce spam and then got perverted by Google because of problems with PageRank manipulation.

    Sometimes it all gets so tiresome.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    487
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Re: Rel=author dead, rel=publisher not

    They are totally committed to throwing anything out if it fails testing. No sacred cows.

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    953
    Thanks (Received)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    12

    Re: Rel=author dead, rel=publisher not

    Figured it was only a matter of time before this happened. Once they started reducing authorship images to showing only 15% (someone can fact check the correct percentage if they want) of the time, I think we all pretty much knew it was a death sentence for authorship.

    I'm not worried about this change. Sure it's a bummer for some, but it got really abused by everyone. Plus Google wants to make sure users are looking at their ads, not at the organic results
    My rarely updated website (I should fix that) - https://www.ericrohrback.com
    Follow me on Twitter
    Want to talk? Book time with me here

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-15-2014, 10:54 AM
  2. Replies: 49
    Last Post: 04-23-2014, 07:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •