GradeUs banner  below header new
Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Member Since
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    3
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    On 7 pack but breaking all rules?

    I have been trying to get my client ranked in the 7 pack for "pest control las vegas" and are telling them about the importance of website content, reviews, location, etc., yet they point to others ranking without even completing places info. Here is one example "JS Pest control" ranking 4th without website or even a complete places listing? What's up? Also, what weight to location play anymore? I'm hearing centroid doesn't matter anymore? And that the mobile users location trump for mobile?
    Last edited by Linda Buquet; 03-10-2013 at 11:38 AM. Reason: Moved from general discussion to Ranking Puzzles

  2. Local Marketing Summit banner in thread
  3. #2
    Member Since
    Jun 2012
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    15,619
    Thanks (Received)
    151
    Likes (Received)
    160

    Re: On 7 pack but breaking all rules?

    Hi bdisalvio and welcome!

    I'm going to move this post to our Ranking Puzzles section of the forum and see if we can get some members to try to figure it out. I just took a quick peek and here's what I found.

    Quote Originally Posted by bdisalvio View Post
    I'm hearing centroid doesn't matter anymore? And that the mobile users location trump for mobile?
    Centroid mainly played and still does play a part in the old pack algo. Not so much in the new blended algo. In blended, organic ranking factors play the biggest part but the JS site is sort of an exception to that rule because it ranks with no site connected at all. That happens sometimes and I can't really explain it.

    JS Pest control does have a site and it ranks #2 organic for "pest control las vegas",

    But that listing you are talking about for JS, in the local blended listings, ranks F for me and you are right, no site, just what looks like an unclaimed bare G+ L page.

    Searching maps via phone shows 2 listings: (702) 248-7378 - Google Maps. One with hidden address the other visible. But neither looks claimed (by the manage this page test). But they both have multiple categories so may be claimed and that test is just not working on this one.)

    SOOOO if the site ranks so high, why does the 2nd G+ L page not connect to rank in blended? Why is the other listing that has NO site attached ranking on page one instead? (One answer could be the 2nd listing with address hidden has no address in Map Maker therefore it may be new and not ranking yet?)

    I hit a couple weird things in Map Maker.

    Link to both in MM: (702) 248-7378 (Top one has history, bottom one does not.)
    (I could SWEAR as I was going back and forth on the top one the address changed but I can't re-produce it and am out of time.)

    I'm out of time to research any more on this one for now. So let's see if anyone else has ideas.
    Linda Buquet .:. Forum Founder, Google Local Specialist

    If you benefit from advice here... Please pay the community back by sharing on social OR helping someone else at the forum. Thank you!

    Don't Miss Important News & Tips! Subscribe to Daily Email Digest Here

    Note: Due to mulitple RSI injuries, pardon short replies. Typos? Blame it on "Dragon".

Similar Threads

  1. Differentiating Blended Local Results and Pack Results
    By Mike Wilton in forum Local Search
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-20-2013, 08:59 AM
  2. Breaking: Google Maps for iPhone Just in Time for SMBs Christmas
    By Linda Buquet in forum Mobile & Social
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-13-2012, 04:33 AM
  3. BREAKING: SEOmoz Acquires GetListed & David Mihm
    By Linda Buquet in forum Local Search
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-06-2012, 08:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Local Marketing Summit banner above footer new