GradeUs banner  below header new
Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19
  1. #1
    Member Since
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    16
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    6

    Practitioner listings - to claim or not to claim

    Hey everyone,

    I've been following Joy's advice by generally not claiming individual practitioner pages and, instead, focusing efforts on the company page (unless circumstances dictate otherwise).

    However, I've now got one client with multiple practitioner Google My Business pages (all unclaimed) which use the incorrect format (Company name: Practitioner name) as it's not a single practitioner business.

    Does this change anything? Is it worth claiming these to simply update the name? With the "Company name: Practitioner name" format, are they more likely to be seen as duplicates of the company listing (not just on Google, but across the whole local ecosystem)?

    Ultimately, the business listing is ranking in local search - it's a small town with little competition so probably any action or inaction isn't going to change much.

    But, if this issue crops up again, what would people advise?

    Thanks!

    Martin

  2. Local Marketing Summit banner in thread
  3. #2
    Member Since
    Jun 2012
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    17,331
    Thanks (Received)
    145
    Likes (Received)
    145

    Re: Practitioner listings - to claim or not to claim

    Hi Martin,

    I would not claim. That would just give them more power to displace the practice listing.

    You can edit right on the listing without claiming. Change name and remove website if listed.

    Here is a lot more info for you:
    Overcoming Google Practitioner Duplicate Listing Problems for Dentists, Attorneys
    Linda Buquet .:. Forum Founder, Google Local Specialist

    If you benefit from advice here... Please pay the community back by sharing on social OR helping someone else at the forum. Thank you!

    Don't Miss Important News & Tips! Subscribe to Daily Email Digest Here

    Note: Due to mulitple RSI injuries, pardon short replies. Typos? Blame it on "Dragon".

  4. #3
    Member Since
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    2,902
    Thanks (Received)
    28
    Likes (Received)
    40

    Re: Practitioner listings - to claim or not to claim

    I would be more than happy to approve the edits for you (I'm a Map Maker Regional Lead in the US)
    Colan Nielsen l GMB Top Contributor
    Vice President, Local Search at Sterling Sky
    Connect on Google + and Twitter

  5. #4
    Member Since
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    16
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    6

    Re: Practitioner listings - to claim or not to claim

    That would be great Colan! Thanks!

    What's th next step?

  6. #5
    Member Since
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    2,902
    Thanks (Received)
    28
    Likes (Received)
    40

    Re: Practitioner listings - to claim or not to claim

    Hi Martin,

    Make the edits to the unclaimed practitioner listings in Google Maps or Google Map Maker. Post links to the listings here, or PM me if you want to keep them private.
    Colan Nielsen l GMB Top Contributor
    Vice President, Local Search at Sterling Sky
    Connect on Google + and Twitter

  7. #6
    Member Since
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    61
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    5

    Re: Practitioner listings - to claim or not to claim

    I disagree with Linda's logic as to why not to verify them.

    Google "knows" of their existence and will typically not let you delete them. As such claiming them in and of itself will not impact the ranking of your main listing one way or the other.

    Claiming them does give you more control over the visual aspects of the
    Listing and thus you can make it more appealing.

    Google has developed a pretty good understanding of "sub" entities and their relation to primary entities. And will show one or the other based on their internal logic. In some markets we see the doctor listing as being the prominent one. And making sure that the URL is correct the strength can be passed up and down the line.

    The real question for me is not whether you should verified and gain control which has little cost associated with it but whether you should take the time to build out citations and prominence for the other listings.

  8. #7
    Member Since
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,722
    Thanks (Received)
    49
    Likes (Received)
    52

    Re: Practitioner listings - to claim or not to claim

    Hey Martin,

    Just wanted to jump in and clarify. I'm guessing you were referring to this article.

    So just to be clear, I definitely would not make an absolute statement that you should never verify practitioner listings. I actually listed lots of examples of cases where you would want to verify them. In your case, if the information is wrong and you can't easily get it corrected, verifying would be a great option. You can still easily minimize the listing by removing the website field. Note: you actually can't do that unless you verify the listing so if anything, sometimes verifying is better for that reason alone. If you tried to edit the listing on MapMaker and remove the URL, the edit would get denied. Do this same thing in GMB and it would go through just fine!

    The one thing I did mention that I pretty much hardly ever do is create/verify a listing for a practitioner that doesn't already have one. HOWEVER, I'm about to publish my next Search Engine Land article on a chiropractor case I took on recently where the doctor that left his office is actually hurting because she doesn't have a page at her new practice.

    So in a nutshell, it always depends on weighing the pros and cons. Like Mike said, verifying a listing doesn't help its ranking power. At least not that I've seen any time recently.

  9. #8
    Member Since
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    61
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    5

    Re: Practitioner listings - to claim or not to claim

    I think that while it is possible that you might want to remove the URLs from practitioner listings it is equally possible that you might want to add a practitioner URL to the listing.

    The reason for this is that these sub entities can actually add strength the the practice listing itself.

    There isn't, as Joy pointed out, a simple single answer to this.

    But if the individual listings are in Maps, then minimally verifying them and IF YOU HAVE the budget consider if there is a benefit to promoting them or if not enough budget possibly (though URL minimizing) demoting them.

    In some markets and in some specialties Google is showing a strong preference for the indvidual practitioner.

    Also if one of the practitioners is well known and has a strong internet presence (perhaps he has spoken at conferences etc) by adding his URL it might actually help the main listings.

  10. #9
    Member Since
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    1,171
    Thanks (Received)
    18
    Likes (Received)
    22

    Re: Practitioner listings - to claim or not to claim

    Joy, what is the appropriate naming sequence for a single practitioner listings vs multiple practitioner listings?

    Is it single = "New York Dental Associates: Jack Smith DDS"

    And multiple simply = "Jack Smith DDS"?
    Tutelary Marketing, Owner
    Local Listing Ninja - Business Listing Service
    Local Listing Ninja Reviews - Check Out Our 100+ 5 Star Reviews!

  11. #10
    Member Since
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    61
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    5

    Re: Practitioner listings - to claim or not to claim

    You got it. Google explicitly addresses this question in their guide lines: https://support.google.com/business/.../3038177?hl=en

    Multiple practitioners at one location

    If the practitioner is one of several public-facing practitioners at this location:

    The organization should create a listing for this location, separate from that of the practitioner.
    The title of the listing for the practitioner should include only the name of the practitioner, and shouldn’t include the name of the organization.
    Solo practitioners that belong to branded organizations

    If a practitioner is the only public-facing practitioner at a location and represents a branded organization, it's best for the practitioner to share a listing with the organization. Create a single listing, named using the following format: [brand/company]: [practitioner name].

    Acceptable: "Allstate: Joe Miller" (if Joe is the sole public-facing practitioner at this Allstate-branded location)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-02-2016, 12:30 PM
  2. New Listings: Claim in G+ Local or Directly in Google+?
    By Andrew Forster in forum Google Local
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-02-2013, 04:26 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Local Marketing Summit banner above footer new