Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,672
    Thanks (Received)
    12
    Likes (Received)
    18

    How Much do Canonical URL Issues Impact Ranking?

    I often come across businesses that have canonical issues, meaning that example.com and Example Domain might both return 200 codes instead of having one 301 to the other. It generally happens more with sites that have https.

    I was wondering what impact you guys are seeing this have these days for SEO? All the articles on these topics are super old and I was curious to see if you find it's one of those things that isn't a huge issue anymore since Google might be "smart enough" to figure it out.

    I know in the past it was said that having 2 different versions of your URL could hurt ranking juice flow or Page Rank flow which hurts ranking but honestly haven't seen much on this topic in a long time.

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Kraków, Poland
    Posts
    8
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Re: How Much do Canonical URL Issues Impact Ranking?

    Hey Joy,

    One of most surprising effects of canonical I experienced was when I first stared to use it on ecommerce store of my client. Those days we had a lot of useless product pages which were gathering a lot of traffic from specific keywords but not convert because the products were out of stock. I used canonicals on these pages and point them to relevant category pages. Surprising effect was that Google switched the traffic from out of stock product pages to these category pages and in many cases even with better positions.

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Jun 2012
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    17,063
    Thanks (Received)
    42
    Likes (Received)
    50

    Re: How Much do Canonical URL Issues Impact Ranking?

    Hey Joy,

    This is a little out of my depth, so pardon if too far off topic.

    But since you mention SSH, I think this info from Helmut in the doc is very interesting.
    https://www.en.advertisercommunity.c...-p/824801#M405

    I mean I realize his findings are re not being able to get a site to stick in GMB, but it also sort of points to the fact that Google sometimes gets confused with SSH sites. (If I remember right, been a couple days since I read it.)
    Linda Buquet .:. Forum Founder, Google Local Specialist

    If you benefit from advice here... Please pay the community back by sharing on social OR helping someone else at the forum. Thank you!

    Don't Miss Important News & Tips! Subscribe to Daily Email Digest Here

    Note: Due to mulitple RSI injuries, pardon short replies. Typos? Blame it on "Dragon".

  4. #4
    Member Since
    May 2013
    Location
    Costa Mesa, Ca
    Posts
    227
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Re: How Much do Canonical URL Issues Impact Ranking?

    Canonical URL issues can be huge in terms of both organic rankings and pack rankings. Usually one of the first things a site should resolve.
    Dan Leibson
    Vice President of Local & Product
    Local SEO Guide Inc.
    @danleibson
    + Dan Leibson

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    164
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    3

    Re: How Much do Canonical URL Issues Impact Ranking?

    I don't see much of a difference. I have some very anecdotal information:

    1. This past year I have fixed 3-4 sites that were resolving both at the www. and at the root domain. I did not notice any major change in traffic. Sometimes that tough, because we do so many changes. I have one that changed about 30 days ago, and we have made no other substantial changes. The traffic is roughly the same.

    2. (this is vaguely related): I had a site that screwed up the canonical tag on the home page. The canonical tag was mistakenly edited to www.www.example.com that DID have an impact. The home page basically disappeared from search. I know that's not the same thing, but there are some similarities.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,672
    Thanks (Received)
    12
    Likes (Received)
    18

    Re: How Much do Canonical URL Issues Impact Ranking?

    Quote Originally Posted by HoosierBuff View Post
    I don't see much of a difference. I have some very anecdotal information:

    1. This past year I have fixed 3-4 sites that were resolving both at the www. and at the root domain. I did not notice any major change in traffic. Sometimes that tough, because we do so many changes. I have one that changed about 30 days ago, and we have made no other substantial changes. The traffic is roughly the same.

    2. (this is vaguely related): I had a site that screwed up the canonical tag on the home page. The canonical tag was mistakenly edited to www.www.example.com that DID have an impact. The home page basically disappeared from search. I know that's not the same thing, but there are some similarities.
    I have actually found the same thing as you in both scenarios. I also spoke to someone once who had a page unindexed because they had a canonical pointing to a non-existant URL.


  7. #7
    Member Since
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    37
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Re: How Much do Canonical URL Issues Impact Ranking?

    Canonical tags are very important, even more, important nowaday. Web sites create many web pages, and some create dup by itself and with a canonical tag it allows you tell search engine" hey this it the main page" so they index it instead of the dup or non-main web page


    Not using canonical tags can also decrease rankings due to canalization, having the same canonical tag on multiple pages defeats the purpose and search engine most likely will ignore the tag. Which cause confusion and in turn lower rankings.

    Rule of thumb:

    Use Canonical tags when appropriate
    Use for pages that have duplicate content, and point to main source.
    Use one per page.

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    954
    Thanks (Received)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    13

    Re: How Much do Canonical URL Issues Impact Ranking?

    I'm late to the game here, but canonicals can make or break you. I've seen cases where they're completely botched and organic traffic suffered. Soon after they were fixed, it was like a flip of a switch and things started working right. Like others have mentioned, canonical tags are very important for ecommerce sites.
    My rarely updated website (I should fix that) - https://www.ericrohrback.com
    Follow me on Twitter
    Want to talk? Book time with me here

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Jun 2016
    Location
    NE
    Posts
    25
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Re: How Much do Canonical URL Issues Impact Ranking?

    Quote Originally Posted by MarketingGiant View Post


    having the same canonical tag on multiple pages defeats the purpose and search engine most likely will ignore the tag
    Can you elaborate on this?

    I have an ecommerce site that I am optimizing currently and we have added a generic FAQ page that incorporates the content from a number of other pages (i.e. installation, return policy, etc.). I was wondering if using canonical linking would be appropriate to point from these specific question pages to the main FAQ page as the source?

    The FAQ page is new, the other pages rank well and receive decent amounts of organic traffic.

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    954
    Thanks (Received)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    13

    Re: How Much do Canonical URL Issues Impact Ranking?

    The purpose of a canonical tag is to specify the best page on the site for that topic. It's a way to consolidate duplicate pages, or in the case of eCommerce, a way to make sure your parameters and session IDs are not being indexed by search engines.

    Your FAQ page should really be unique content if you want it to rank or have any weight in Google (if that's the goal). If you point from all your other pages to that FAQ, you aren't really using the tag in the correct way. You might end up hurting the site in the long run. Think of a canonical as a "soft 301" in the way that you're not making a server side redirect, but search engines still acknowledge it as a redirect (to some degree).

    Do you want those other pages to exist or do you want to send users looking for all your other pages to a singular source (the FAQ page)?
    My rarely updated website (I should fix that) - https://www.ericrohrback.com
    Follow me on Twitter
    Want to talk? Book time with me here

Similar Threads

  1. How Much Does Keyword Stuffing Impact Ranking?
    By JoyHawkins in forum Ranking Puzzles
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-30-2016, 05:41 AM
  2. 100% Complete Doesn't Impact Ranking
    By Colan Nielsen in forum NAP, Categories, Dashboard Data
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-19-2012, 08:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •