Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    Member Since
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    19
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Question Did "Hawk" actually reverse the impact of "Possum"? Not being found in the snack pack

    A little frustrated here. Trying to help a new client rank for a local term: escape room (cityname). I breathed some life into their social accounts, redesigned their website and optimized it as much as they would allow me to.

    They rank between #12 - #15 organic on Google.

    I would have expected to see them at least somewhere in the local search results, among those 20 listings.

    They have 4.5 star rating and 19 reviews. NAP is consistent on all their citation listings.

    Some competitors who are in the local search results are in neighboring cities even. The lowest stats for those who are ranking: 4 star rating & 18 reviews.

    The kicker: my client is in a skyscraper with 3 of their competitors. So, 4 different escape room businesses in the same building. Only 1 out of the 4 businesses are in the local search results. If you zoom right into the building on Google Maps, then you can see all 4 businesses.

    So, with the Possum update came filtering of businesses in the snack pack if they shared the same address and/or phone number.

    Well, all 4 businesses share the same street address (different suite & floor numbers though).

    I thought on Aug 22nd with the Hawk update, that reversed the filtering aspect of Possum. Is that right?


    Any ideas? If you'd like the name of the client and more specs, I will need to divulge that via PM.

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    2,853
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    10

    Re: Did "Hawk" actually reverse the impact of "Possum"? Not being found in the snack

    The hawk update was more of a pulling back on the possum dial versus completely reversing possum or completely killing possum. The algo still exists it's just not as strong anymore. So there's going to be cases where businesses in certain situations will still be filtered.

    Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
    Colan Nielsen l GMB Top Contributor
    Vice President, Local Search at Sterling Sky
    Connect on Google + and Twitter

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    19
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Re: Did "Hawk" actually reverse the impact of "Possum"? Not being found in the snack

    Thanks Colan. Regardless of what exactly happened or didn't happen with Hawk, there should be a way to let Google know there are multiple businesses which are in the same building right?

    I thought Google is all about helping the searcher find what they're looking for.

    It doesn't make sense if 3 out of the 4 businesses are hidden from the search results simply because they are in the same building (different floors and suite numbers).

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,671
    Thanks (Received)
    9
    Likes (Received)
    17

    Re: Did "Hawk" actually reverse the impact of "Possum"? Not being found in the snack

    Although it definitely lessened the filter, listings that are still impacted are ones that share a building or address as clarified here under "Who is still filtered"

    Suite numbers and floors unfortunately make no difference.

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    19
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Re: Did "Hawk" actually reverse the impact of "Possum"? Not being found in the snack

    Thanks Joy. Yes, I read that.

    So, there's no real reason why 1 out of 4 similar businesses in the same building is appearing in the local results?

    And there's nothing at all the other 3 competitors in the same building can do to also appear in the local results?

    Thought there'd be a form or some department at Google which will help. Then they will actually know there are multiple businesses in the same building.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,671
    Thanks (Received)
    9
    Likes (Received)
    17

    Re: Did "Hawk" actually reverse the impact of "Possum"? Not being found in the snack

    So it's this way by design. I believe it's their automated way to eliminate duplicates and spam, even though there are unintended consequences.

    There is something you can do. You have to beat the current winner. The main thing I would focus on is improving organic ranking. Is the current guy who is unfiltered ranking higher than you organically for the same keyword?

    Sent from my XT1563 using Tapatalk

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    19
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Re: Did "Hawk" actually reverse the impact of "Possum"? Not being found in the snack

    That's the thing. It's an automated way to reduce duplicates and spam. This is why I thought there has to be a form or some manual way I can show them that my client is a different business in the same building. It's not a duplicate.

    As for who's ranking higher in the organic results. We are. The 1 business out of the 4 which is unfiltered is on page 3 organic. We are top of page 2. And the other 2 competitors who are also filtered are on page 3 and 4. So, we outrank all of them in organic.

    1 of the filtered competitors outranks the unfiltered one and it has a better avg star rating and amount of reviews. Very confused about that.

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,671
    Thanks (Received)
    9
    Likes (Received)
    17

    Re: Did "Hawk" actually reverse the impact of "Possum"? Not being found in the snack

    Google doesn't normally adjust things manually that are eliminated by an algorithm feature.

    If it's not organic, they must have some other ranking signals that are causing them to "win" against the other 3 businesses. I would suggest doing a very in-depth competitive audit. Normally for Possum filter cases I have consulted for I spend a minimum of 3 hours looking at the various ranking factors and comparing them. You could go by the Moz Local Search Ranking factors as a guide.

    Sent from my XT1563 using Tapatalk

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    19
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Re: Did "Hawk" actually reverse the impact of "Possum"? Not being found in the snack

    If you've been hit by Penguin, you can at least create and fire over a disavow file. So, there's nothing similar for this situation?

    Yes, I'm conducting an audit now on all 4 businesses.

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,671
    Thanks (Received)
    9
    Likes (Received)
    17

    Re: Did "Hawk" actually reverse the impact of "Possum"? Not being found in the snack

    No, unfortunately not.

    Sent from my XT1563 using Tapatalk

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-01-2015, 06:38 AM
  2. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-01-2014, 02:56 PM
  3. Local SEO Thoughts on New Domains (e.g., ".chicago", ".dentist")?
    By Dave Cosper in forum Local SEO & Ranking
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-29-2013, 10:28 AM
  4. MapMapker Displays "Ave" But in Edit Mode its "Avenue"
    By Don Berthiaume in forum Local Search
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-21-2012, 12:49 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •