- Jul 19, 2012
Looks like this algo update is still swinging. Here's a client that saw a significant drop and as of this morning they regained traction.
Not from what I see. I have a legit listing that is in a Regus. The listing KP actually says, located in Regus. They needed to show proof, etc. They have done exceedingly well with this update so far.We control a site that had ranked number one for several years in various keyword combinations, now tanked almost across the board. We were suspended earlier this year for an alleged virtual office, which we disproved after submitting all kinds of evidence that we had a real office (but we are on the same *floor* as a Da Vinci office, in a large building). Does anyone think there could be a correlation between offices in these locations and rank drop? We are not currently suspended.
Okay thank you very much for sharing.Not from what I see. I have a legit listing that is in a Regus. The listing KP actually says, located in Regus. They needed to show proof, etc. They have done exceedingly well with this update so far.
If you have a strong GMB (authority) you won't need to worry much about proximity. I actually like when google does this, makes it more challenging for single businesses to dominate an entire city. The word "Best" as a keyword can be manipulated in the serps. Sometimes there are way better services that aren't ranking anywhere near the top 10, yet they are unheard of because their marketing sucks. Best plumber can be a 30 year old company that is spread through word of mouth, but hardly any presence online.Yes. It's all over the place. My quick look at a few SERPs is not at all conclusive. Just food for thought.
My HOPE is that it's category dependent. I hope that Google has stopped making proximity such a strong signal for SABs. Their physical location is not something the user cares about. They are just looking for the best painter, plumber, pest control technician, etc. Proximity should be dialed down for SABs and the results should be more based on relevance and prominence.
You could have literally done nothing and you'd get the same results. Wait it out if you're in panic mode and not sure what you're doing.Alright, I've been trying a few different things out, not drastic changes (even though I wanted to because I am in panic mode on a few gmbs that dropped from 1 to 3 to 5 to 8).
Joy helped me with a client in San Diego where there was a duplicate gmb that we had no idea of. This customer on Nov 7th dropped to spot 64 from top 3 pack. Once that was removed and I changed our service locations and did a little keyword editing on the site, we are back to main keyword in 3 pack.
A client in Las Vegas, dropped to 18th spot. No duplicate listings, etc. I edited the schema mark up, changed service locations in GMB, went down to 2 categories from 4 categories, changed site title and description, andddd removed address from GMB to change to SAB. Updated all citations with service areas and no address and added meta tag for zip codes on the site. Today it is ranking for main keywords in 254 spots 1 to 3 today from only 29 a few days ago.
Could this have helped or am I just delusional and this update is still working itself out and helped with the boost?
That's probably because the Maps API doesn't pick up on any SABs with hidden addresses and most spam listings use that format.I am seeing a LOT of new spammy SABs showing up in actual local search results, but they won't appear in tools that rely only upon the Maps API.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|Most Active Local Search Forum Members November 2019||LSF News and Announcements||0|
|Forum software upgrade November 6, 2019||LSF News and Announcements||1|
|Free: TechSEO Boost 2018 - Thursday, November 29, 2018||Coming Events||1|
|Free webinar, SEO in 2019, from Yoast: November 20, 2018||Coming Events||0|
|Google+ and Local Search Buzz ? November 2012||Local Search||2|